HelpQA Tags Search FAQ
Start a New Post Chat Login & Registration

624 replies, Replies 361 to 370

obligatory insolence

Big-Al-One wrote:
Because, sometimes, you just gotta knock a muther-fkkerz teeth out....

There's one at work with me now that I would LOVE to do that to!!!!

- written
Hollywood has a double standard where victimization is concerned.

What happened up there with all the comments removed? ^^^

- written
Hollywood has a double standard where victimization is concerned.

Didn't the original girl eventually say it wasn't true?

Or maybe she just said she didn't want him charged.

I don't get that tho, if he really did ****rape her, why wouldn't she want him punished?

He first went to a country he couldn't be exiled from, and has been hiding within legal loopholes since.

- written
Post Closed Post Closed

Big-Al-One wrote:

J.N-Bucking wrote:
They must be sedated to stay still for that.
Poor things, that must drive them crazy with itching.
I'd never heard of mangoworms.

Congradulations, you get the honorable medal of bravery.

The bot fly, as you may or may not know, will attack another insect - usually another flier and lays an egg or two on it. This form of appropriation is called vector hosting. It puts the burden of delivery to the other insect.
The mammal as the final victim, becomes the incubator for the larvae until the worm hatches into the fly.
Here in the West, we have bot flies - though not so far into the northern regions.
But....when you think it couldn't get any worse....
The Mango fly is ever more nastier and wicked. It lays hundreds of eggs, usually in the dirt, where they mature to very tiny boring maggots. There, they wait for an unsuspecting victim to lay down and rest or simply to be walked upon by bare foot or hoof. Then hundreds of super tiny maggots bore their way into the pores of the skin where the feed from the capillaries of the mammal, growing as the days pass.
Unlike the boy fly, the mango fly worms can carpet the entire body of a living animal - effectively killing it.
This nasy little critter is a product of Africa. The vet clinic you see in this video is located in the Gambia of Africa.
If you're an animal in Africa...it's a hard knock life.

I will wear that medal proudly.

I have heard of bot flies.

Extremely glad we don't get any of the creatures mentioned in this post here.

- written
Post Closed Post Closed

They must be sedated to stay still for that.

Poor things, that must drive them crazy with itching.

I'd never heard of mangoworms.

- written
Post Closed Post Closed

Eewww

- written
This gender neutral initiative is confusing.

I don't think people are having surgery and psychiatric evaluations to become that are they?

- written
Why are my chocolate chip cookies cakey and not dense and chewey?

I'd say too low a temp.

You use lower temps to get softer texture.

Possibly could be too much butter as well.

- written
This gender neutral initiative is confusing.

Just because a woman thinks life would be better as a man, or just because a man believes life would be better as a woman, does not make them into something they aren't.

It is clearly not as straight forward as thinking the other ***sex has it better and things would be easier to swap.


I also think it's quite foolish to not assign a gender to a newborn, and then letting him or her "choose" what they want to be. Sorry folks, but Nature has already done that..[/quote]

^^^ fully agree there, that's just going to confuse a child.

- written
This gender neutral initiative is confusing.

Rockster160 wrote:

J.N-Bucking wrote:

Rockster160 wrote:


[quote from J.N-Bucking]

Haha. That’s fair. In those (very rare) cases, I think whichever organs are functional should determine the “official” gender.
It’s up to them though. Like I said, people can do what they want. If you want to dress like boy and have people mistake you a boy, that’s fine. But if you’re not a boy, don’t go around trying to tell people you are, and don’t get mad when they don’t. (Goes for the opposite as well, obviously.)

But yes, in the rare case of a *************hermaphrodite, to avoid confusion, they should be welcome to “choose”.

So the person born with both organs gets to choose (or most likely their parents do when they're a baby) and there's no telling that the selected ***sex would be the one the person identifies with, and if thats the case youve now got someone living in the wrong body.

So do they need to suffer or can they swap over?

Or if people have to stick with what they're born with should the hermafradite need to be male AND female forever, never feeling normal.

Since people are supposed to be either male OR female, and what you're born with is what you are, then hermafradites couldn't exist.

If we accept that they do indeed exist, and it was some sort of genetic mutation of the foetus that caused a person to have both organs, don't we then have no choice to accept that some sort of genetic issue (or any other issue in conception or gestation could not only cause a person to be born with BOTH, but be born with the WRONG ones?

The choice in this matter is because they ARE both. To avoid confusion/embarrassment. They are what they are, there is no denying that.
It IS a genetic mutation. Again, unalterable fact.

The term "wrong ones" used in this reference is used incorrectly, because it's used to cover an opinion. Gender is not opinion. It's a state. You can't change the color of your eyes or the color of your hair. You can dye your hair and put in different colored contacts, but that simply hides what they really are. Just like you can dress as the opposite gender. It doesn't actually change anything, it just hides the truth. I could say my eyes are the "wrong color". I can claim my eyes are golden or red all I want. I can get contacts that make them LOOK that color. But my eyes are, and forever will be, blue. Does that mean my eyes are the wrong color? No. It's not the color I want, sure. But they aren't "wrong". It's a state of reality, not a question of opinion.

(I love my eyes- just using eye color as example.)

Yes they ARE both, but they're going to have surgery to BECOME just one.
So now they are let's say male, would you be reluctant to call them he / him?
That's not what they were born as after all.
Wouldn't it be CORRECT to always see that person as a heshe / sheman?
Would it be fair to refer to them as such since that's what they were born as, and gender is a state after all, so they can never be male OR female.

I wouldn't class a man dressed as a woman as a woman, but once they've lived that way a few years and undergone all the psychiatric evaluations needed before treatment and surgery, and once they have undergone full reasignment surgery, LEGALLY changed their gender, ill happily see them as, and call them a woman.

- written

To use this site you must be 13 years or older and occasionally submit your email address. Your email address is only shared with your explicit permission.

Home Page - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Feedback