Post Closed Post Closed
If you are contemplating suicide, hurting yourself, or you are seriously depressed: please, seek professional help!
Call this hotline (1-800-273-8255) operated by our friends at the Suicide Prevention Lifeline, anytime, for free, professional, and confidential assistance. While other Helpers are likely to reply to your post, please make sure you understand that your use of Help-QA.com falls under or TOS.
Note: I'm a robot that the Help-QA creators programmed. If this response is in error, I apologize, please ignore it.
I can't say anything for certain regarding gov meddling, but consider einstein's role in the creation of the atomic bomb:
http://www.doug-long.com/einstein.htm
Ultimately, when making groundbreaking research, you must come to terms with humanity's potential usage of it, for good or ill. What happens in reality is unpredictable. Your only choice is whose hands will be the first to receive it. Electing not to purse or publicise findings may only delay the discovery beside removing your involvement.
Help me with: [quote]Test.
[/quote]
In that case there's no reason to hesitate. There are always enthusiasts on the physics forums with imaginative ideas. Bear in mind however that when they don't use the scientific lingo, disrespect is common. So merely a matter of personal preference, the way I see it.
Help me with: [quote]Test.
[/quote]
Go for it.
Otherwise it's all been for nothing.
It's thought that a corpse in space would not decompose, or certainly not at a quick rate.
If it didn't float too close to a hear source and burn to nothing it could go on forever, even becoming it's own eco system and creating new life.
J.N-Bucking wrote:
It's thought that a corpse in space would not decompose, or certainly not at a quick rate.If it didn't float too close to a hear source and burn to nothing it could go on forever, even becoming it's own eco system and creating new life.
This is uncanny, j...
Help me with: [quote]Test.
[/quote]
Yอคอญอฅฬeti. wrote:
J.N-Bucking wrote:
It's thought that a corpse in space would not decompose, or certainly not at a quick rate.If it didn't float too close to a hear source and burn to nothing it could go on forever, even becoming it's own eco system and creating new life.
This is uncanny, j...
I see this as evidence for the many worlds theory :)
Since I very much doubt @Rockster160 integrated any inter-universal telecommunication capabilities during the site's reconstruction, that would pose a terrible threat for one of these cataclysmic collision events. As such, it is essential to handwave such evidence at the inception.
Help me with: [quote]Test.
[/quote]
Yอคอญอฅฬeti. wrote:
Since I very much doubt @Rockster160 integrated any inter-universal telecommunication capabilities during the site's reconstruction, that would pose a terrible threat for one of these cataclysmic collision events. As such, it is essential to handwave such evidence at the inception.
You don't know for sure that he didn't.
And, even if he didn't in this world, he almost definitely did in another world.
๐
Well then . . this is as simple as it gets.
Attraction! Gravity is a force that lives in every corner of the Universe.
With enough alcohol intake, it takes on new meaning at the local pub. lol
If you go with the idea that energy is constant and can't be created or destroyed, then you must adhere to the equal but opposite notion. So, if there is a force, that force exists equally in it's opposite. Gravity would not be an exception to this.
Help me with: painted
Big-Al-One wrote:
I like the input so far.
Hopefully a few more people will respond with their views so I can see a broader consensus and make a decision for the better or worse.
As for the question of a body decomposing in space, I never expected it to be such a sought out question.
Honestly, I think not. I think it would become freeze dried - mummified so to say. Like those little bits you get in a Cup O Noodles.
I'm not convinced by the freeze dried idea.
How would it happen?
It can be done with nitrogen, but there won't be any.
Also, what would happen to the liquid?
Ok I've been thinking about it, and I think your idea about freeze drying is plausible.
What we haven't yet taken into consideration is the effects the radiation would have on the corpse.
So let's assume it's far enough from a heat source to not be mummified or cremated, and away from the cold to not freeze, I still believe that the body could float around for thousands of years or longer.
But as I see it, whatever distance it is from heat and cold, there would be no avoiding radiation.
Whilst the most damage done by radiation is internal and to DNA it would also be breaking down the outside, right?
And also, let's go back to my earlier scinareo where the corpse comes to rest on solid ground.
It would then be able to be the source of some new life form, even if it was just a form of bacteria....
Now, since that new life form has come from a contaminated body, would the new organism be mutated or not since it's being born into a radioactive environment
The radiation -
It's gamma rays from star / planet explosions, right?
Gamma can get through pretty much anything.
If I remember rightly from science lessons it can only travel in straight lines.
There's all sorts of radiation going on up there.
Pretty sure we don't know everything about it.
Contamination and radiation acts differently depending on it's surroundings.
Gamma can travel through a vaccum, and if it can do that then the supposed sterile areas of space would be radioactive.
I don't know how convinced I am about it being sterile.
I get why were being careful and not letting the mars rover and it's predecessors near the water for fear of contamination, but that still doesn't mean it's sterile.
(Having to write in parts as I'm at work, a few times when I've had to close my phone and do my job, when I've come back to a partially written reply it's vanished)
How are we so sure it's sterile up there anyway?
But that is being judged by earth standards.
It could be entirely different rules up there.
Just because earth life can't survive high radiation levels doesn't guarantee alien life can't.
They found organisms living on the outside of a satellite.
They don't seem to have had an issue with radiation.
I don't buy it that a planet that has water would not have some sort of life on it.
A FORBIDDEN THEORYยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
Uranium is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.ยฌ
----------------ยฌ
ยฌ
When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.ยฌ
The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.ยฌ
You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.ยฌ
A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.ยฌ
To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.ยฌ
The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.ยฌ
The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.ยฌ
Here's why...ยฌ
(S - N) ๐ Here is a magnetic as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -ยฌ
ยฌ
(S - N // N - ?)ยฌ
ยฌ
As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.ยฌ
Let's look at it again -ยฌ
(S-N/repelling/N-N?)ยฌ
This๐is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? Not possible!ยฌ
The north/south assignment to magnetism does not work.ยฌ
Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -ยฌ
(- +)ยฌ
(- +//+ ?)ยฌ
These formulas do not solve without a remainder that reveals the math system to be a false premise...ยฌ
The only working system that you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.ยฌ
A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -ยฌ
( /repel/ )ยฌ
Or more accurately -ยฌ
( ) /repel/ ( )ยฌ
[because there are two halves].ยฌ
ยฌ
Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.ยฌ
ยฌ
When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.ยฌ
I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.ยฌ
Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.ยฌ
Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?
A FORBIDDEN THEORYยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
Uranium is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.ยฌ
----------------ยฌ
ยฌ
When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.ยฌ
The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.ยฌ
You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.ยฌ
A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.ยฌ
To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.ยฌ
The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.ยฌ
The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.ยฌ
Here's why...ยฌ
(S - N) ๐ Here is a magnetic as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -ยฌ
ยฌ
(S - N // N - ?)ยฌ
ยฌ
As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.ยฌ
Let's look at it again -ยฌ
(S-N/repelling/N-N?)ยฌ
This๐is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? Not possible!ยฌ
The north/south assignment to magnetism does not work.ยฌ
Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -ยฌ
(- +)ยฌ
(- +//+ ?)ยฌ
These formulas do not solve without a remainder that reveals the math system to be a false premise...ยฌ
The only working system that you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.ยฌ
A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -ยฌ
( /repel/ )ยฌ
Or more accurately -ยฌ
( ) /repel/ ( )ยฌ
[because there are two halves].ยฌ
ยฌ
Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.ยฌ
ยฌ
When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.ยฌ
I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.ยฌ
Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.ยฌ
Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?
A FORBIDDEN THEORYยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
Uranium is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.ยฌ
----------------ยฌ
ยฌ
When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.ยฌ
The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.ยฌ
You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.ยฌ
A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.ยฌ
To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.ยฌ
The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.ยฌ
The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.ยฌ
Here's why...ยฌ
(S - N) ๐ Here is a magnet as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -ยฌ
ยฌ
(S - N // N - ?)ยฌ
ยฌ
As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.ยฌ
Let's look at it again -ยฌ
(S-N/repelling/N-N?)ยฌ
This๐is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? How does the right half of the magnet properly reassign its polarities according to the N/S paradigm? Not possible!ยฌ
The north/south assignment to magnetism does not work.ยฌ
Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments to magnetism do not work.ยฌ
Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -ยฌ
(- +)ยฌ
(- +//+ ?)ยฌ
These formulas do not solve without a remainder that reveals the math system to be a false premise...ยฌ
The only working system that you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.ยฌ
A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -ยฌ
( /repel/ )ยฌ
Or more accurately -ยฌ
( ) /repel/ ( )ยฌ
[because there are two halves].ยฌ
ยฌ
Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.ยฌ
ยฌ
When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.ยฌ
I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which shows the principal math system to be a false...ยฌ
The only working system you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.ยฌ
A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -ยฌ
( /repel/ )ยฌ
Or more accurately -ยฌ
( ) /repel/ ( )ยฌ
[because there are two halves].ยฌ
ยฌ
Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.ยฌ
ยฌ
When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.ยฌ
ยฌ
Let us, for a moment consider the *strength* of repulsion between the two halves. Let's force the two broken halves back together at the fracture point and hold them there. We suddenly release the two halves and they slide apart until each of the magnetic fields are no longer effective within the field range.ยฌ
Let's say (for example) the two halves repelled each other a distance of 6 inches.ยฌ
If the element of the magnet were greater, the two halves would have repelled further.ยฌ
What do you think would happen if the magnet were made of Uranium and you broke it in half? The chances are, if you had a good grip on each half of the magnet, it would tear both of your arms clean out of your shoulder sockets, as each half repelled away from each other.ยฌ
Now, you're getting the idea of the power of what a Uranium magnet has. But, there's more involved than meets the eye...ยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.ยฌ
I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.ยฌ
Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.ยฌ
Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?
A FORBIDDEN THEORYยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
UraniumAntigravity is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.ยฌ
----------------ยฌ
ยฌ
When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.ยฌ
The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.ยฌ
You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.ยฌ
A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.ยฌ
To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.ยฌ
The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.ยฌ
The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.ยฌ
Here's why...ยฌ
(S - N) ๐ Here is a magnet as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -ยฌ
ยฌ
(S - N // N - ?)ยฌ
ยฌ
As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.ยฌ
Let's look at it again -ยฌ
(S-N/repelling/N-N?)ยฌ
This๐is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? How does the right half of the magnet properly reassign its polarities according to the N/S paradigm? Not possible!ยฌ
The north/south assignments to magnetism do not work.ยฌ
Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -ยฌ
(- +)ยฌ
(- +//+ ?)ยฌ
These formulas do not solve which shows the principal math system to be a false...ยฌ
The only working system you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.ยฌ
A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -ยฌ
( /repel/ )ยฌ
Or more accurately -ยฌ
( ) /repel/ ( )ยฌ
[because there are two halves].ยฌ
ยฌ
Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.ยฌ
ยฌ
When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.ยฌ
ยฌ
Let us, for a moment consider the *strength* of repulsion between the two halves. Let's force the two broken halves back together at the fracture point and hold them there. We suddenly release the two halves and they slide apart until each of the magnetic fields are no longer effective within the field range.ยฌ
Let's say (for example) the two halves repelled each other a distance of 6 inches.ยฌ
If the element of the magnet were greater, the two halves would have repelled further.ยฌ
What do you think would happen if the magnet were made of Uranium and you broke it in half? The chances are, if you had a good grip on each half of the magnet, it would tear both of your arms clean out of your shoulder sockets, as each half repelled away from each other.ยฌ
Now, you're getting the idea of the power of what a Uranium magnet has. But, there's more involved than meets the eye...ยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and conceptsยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.ยฌ
I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.ยฌ
Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.ยฌ
Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?
A FORBIDDEN THEORYยฌ
ยฌ
ยฌ
Antigravity Conceptsยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and conceptsยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.ยฌ
I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.ยฌ
Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.ยฌ
Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?
Antigravity Conceptsยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Although it seems like ordinary science, it's and principals are much different.
AntigravityPost Conceptsยฌ
ยฌ
--------------ยฌ
ยฌ
ForClosed decadesPost I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.ยฌ
Although it seems like ordinary science, it's principals are much different.Closed
Help-QA supports basic Markdown, emoji ๐, and tagging friends with @username!
To use this site you must be 13 years or older and occasionally submit your email address. Your email address is only shared with your explicit permission.