A FORBIDDEN THEORY¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ Uranium is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.¬ ----------------¬ ¬ When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.¬ The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.¬ You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.¬ A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.¬ To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.¬ The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.¬ The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.¬ Here's why...¬ (S - N) 👈 Here is a magnetic as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -¬ ¬ (S - N // N - ?)¬ ¬ As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.¬ Let's look at it again -¬ (S-N/repelling/N-N?)¬ This👆is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? Not possible!¬ The north/south assignment to magnetism does not work.¬ Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -¬ (- +)¬ (- +//+ ?)¬ These formulas do not solve without a remainder that reveals the math system to be a false premise...¬ The only working system that you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.¬ A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -¬ ( /repel/ )¬ Or more accurately -¬ ( ) /repel/ ( )¬ [because there are two halves].¬ ¬ Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.¬ ¬ When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.¬ I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.¬ Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.¬ Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?

A FORBIDDEN THEORY¬ ¬ ¬ Uranium is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.¬ ----------------¬ ¬ When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.¬ The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.¬ You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.¬ A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.¬ To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.¬ The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.¬ The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.¬ Here's why...¬ (S - N) 👈 Here is a magnetic as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -¬ ¬ (S - N // N - ?)¬ ¬ As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.¬ Let's look at it again -¬ (S-N/repelling/N-N?)¬ This👆is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? Not possible!¬ The north/south assignment to magnetism does not work.¬ Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -¬ (- +)¬ (- +//+ ?)¬ These formulas do not solve without a remainder that reveals the math system to be a false premise...¬ The only working system that you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.¬ A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -¬ ( /repel/ )¬ Or more accurately -¬ ( ) /repel/ ( )¬ [because there are two halves].¬ ¬ Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.¬ ¬ When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.¬ I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.¬ Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.¬ Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?

A FORBIDDEN THEORY¬ ¬ ¬ Uranium is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.¬ ----------------¬ ¬ When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.¬ The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.¬ You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.¬ A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.¬ To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.¬ The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.¬ The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.¬ Here's why...¬ (S - N) 👈 Here is a magnet as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -¬ ¬ (S - N // N - ?)¬ ¬ As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.¬ Let's look at it again -¬ (S-N/repelling/N-N?)¬ This👆is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? How does the right half of the magnet properly reassign its polarities according to the N/S paradigm? Not possible!¬ The north/south assignment to magnetism does not work.¬ Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments to magnetism do not work.¬ Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -¬ (- +)¬ (- +//+ ?)¬ These formulas do not solve without a remainder that reveals the math system to be a false premise...¬ The only working system that you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.¬ A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -¬ ( /repel/ )¬ Or more accurately -¬ ( ) /repel/ ( )¬ [because there are two halves].¬ ¬ Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.¬ ¬ When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.¬ I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which shows the principal math system to be a false...¬ The only working system you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.¬ A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -¬ ( /repel/ )¬ Or more accurately -¬ ( ) /repel/ ( )¬ [because there are two halves].¬ ¬ Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.¬ ¬ When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.¬ ¬ Let us, for a moment consider the *strength* of repulsion between the two halves. Let's force the two broken halves back together at the fracture point and hold them there. We suddenly release the two halves and they slide apart until each of the magnetic fields are no longer effective within the field range.¬ Let's say (for example) the two halves repelled each other a distance of 6 inches.¬ If the element of the magnet were greater, the two halves would have repelled further.¬ What do you think would happen if the magnet were made of Uranium and you broke it in half? The chances are, if you had a good grip on each half of the magnet, it would tear both of your arms clean out of your shoulder sockets, as each half repelled away from each other.¬ Now, you're getting the idea of the power of what a Uranium magnet has. But, there's more involved than meets the eye...¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.¬ I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.¬ Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.¬ Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?

A FORBIDDEN THEORY¬ ¬ ¬ UraniumAntigravity is a metal in the sense iron is also a metal. It is mined, and refined from ore by a standard process - although, due to its raidoactivity, protective measures are taken.¬ ----------------¬ ¬ When anything is heated, the molecules become excited and metals such as iron are no exception. You need to liquify iron to be able to make various tools, like forks, knives and spoons.¬ The same iron in a fork can be made magnetic. There are two basic forms of magnetism; temporary magnetism and permanent. The reason a fork is not naturally magnetic is because the atomic structure of its iron was made random when it was molten. After it cooled, the atomic structure solidified and made it permanent. Look at like piling a bunch of toothpicks randomly together and pouring glue over them.¬ You can turn a fork into a temporary magnet by fully wrapping it in wire and connecting the wire ends to a battery. This is called an electromagnet. But the magnetic field lasts only so long as it remains connected to the battery. Once disconnected, the field collapses.¬ A permanent magnet, however, is permanent. These are the little guys you stick to your fridge and various other places that have a metallic surface.¬ To better understand how a permanent magnet is made, consider the following: molten iron is poured into a mould and a heavy electromagnetic field is induced into the molten iron. Because the atoms of iron are "loosened" the induced magnetic field tends to align the atomic polarity of the atoms thereby synchronizing the electron orbits. As the iron cools, the polarized atoms become set and are permanently aligned, therefore maintaining a synchronized and harmonic electron orbits around the nucleus. The harmony of the electron orbits creates it own electromagnetic pressure and an external power source is no longer needed to create the magnetic field.¬ The idea a magnet has a north and a south is a FALSE premise. The idea a magnet has a positive or negative is also a FALSE premise.¬ The bases which solves magnetism with no standing remainders is formulated by the principals of attraction and repulsion, only.¬ Here's why...¬ (S - N) 👈 Here is a magnet as you understand it. Under this condition, this magnet cannot be properly solved when divided. When divided, it shows the math system that has been assigned to it to be false. Let's break the magnet in half and see for ourselves -¬ ¬ (S - N // N - ?)¬ ¬ As you were taught, north and north repel as do south and south. But when a magnet is broken in half, the magnet will *ALWAYS* repel at the fracture point.¬ Let's look at it again -¬ (S-N/repelling/N-N?)¬ This👆is NOT possible. Does the right half of the magnet now have two Norths? How does the right half of the magnet properly reassign its polarities according to the N/S paradigm? Not possible!¬ The north/south assignments to magnetism do not work.¬ Repeating the picture by using positive and negative assignments does no better -¬ (- +)¬ (- +//+ ?)¬ These formulas do not solve which shows the principal math system to be a false...¬ The only working system you can assign to magnetism is attraction or repulsion.¬ A divided magnet always repels at the fracture point - always. So -¬ ( /repel/ )¬ Or more accurately -¬ ( ) /repel/ ( )¬ [because there are two halves].¬ ¬ Now, as you have understood these principals, let's move further.¬ ¬ When a magnet is broken in half, each half repels away from the other half with a given amount of force. Even though each half has a picture like two puzzle pieces that could fit back to each other, they will NEVER come back together again at that point.¬ ¬ Let us, for a moment consider the *strength* of repulsion between the two halves. Let's force the two broken halves back together at the fracture point and hold them there. We suddenly release the two halves and they slide apart until each of the magnetic fields are no longer effective within the field range.¬ Let's say (for example) the two halves repelled each other a distance of 6 inches.¬ If the element of the magnet were greater, the two halves would have repelled further.¬ What do you think would happen if the magnet were made of Uranium and you broke it in half? The chances are, if you had a good grip on each half of the magnet, it would tear both of your arms clean out of your shoulder sockets, as each half repelled away from each other.¬ Now, you're getting the idea of the power of what a Uranium magnet has. But, there's more involved than meets the eye...¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.¬ I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.¬ Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.¬ Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?

A FORBIDDEN THEORY¬ ¬ ¬ Antigravity Concepts¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Specifically, the concepts of the decay rate of matter and the relativity of time.¬ I feel trapped. Although it seems like ordinary science and principals (which it is), it is what these principals are tied to that causes me to refrain.¬ Frankly, I just don't want a visit from some body of government comming to haul me off.¬ Should I just go for it or should I keep it to myself until my dying day?

Antigravity Concepts¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ For decades I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Although it seems like ordinary science, it's and principals are much different.

AntigravityPost Concepts¬ ¬ --------------¬ ¬ ForClosed decadesPost I've been perusing the concept of antigravity propulsion. Trust me it's not an easy subject. But, somewhere long the way, I have accumulated certain principals and concepts that are necessary to know when it comes to antigravity propulsion.¬ Although it seems like ordinary science, it's principals are much different.Closed