907 replies, Replies 321 to 330

Im done..

Lano wrote:

BA1 wrote:

So, stop stating what you believe as if they were fact. (Your rules, not mine).

No....again, you may be missing the context for this. A document is not an opinion. If a document says "this is a patent for a specific coronavirus (Not COVID)" That is a fact, not an opinion.

Correction, is wasn't a patent for a corona virus...ya'll are getting me twisted with your make-believe virus patents. Sigh.

- written
Im done..

BA1 wrote:

So, stop stating what you believe as if they were fact. (Your rules, not mine).

No....again, you may be missing the context for this. A document is not an opinion. If a document says "this is a patent for a specific coronavirus (Not COVID)" That is a fact, not an opinion.


- written
Im done..

BA1 wrote:

You are what we, in the old school, call a "slippery *****bitch." You have no integrity and are deserving of every beat-down you get.
Is it defiance, Lano, or are you really that *******fucking dumb? Here's the disclaimer you knew I was talking about, but decided to be a ****shit-heel instead, and avoided (as usual) the meaning I intended it.

This is really pure silliness.

I think you oughta take a deep breath and re-read this conversation so far. Compare your responses with mine.

You make things incredibly personal for no reason. Why are you name-calling? I implied a lie yes, but I tried to be as delicate about it as possible. You don't think it was sincere. I don't know what to tell you. All I can say is I don't get why my criticism of the misinformation about has to be so personal. You are saying something false. I tell you that it is false. And your defense isn't that it's actually true, it's to accuse me of calling someone a liar.

Who cares if I called him a liar? I apologized for it. Ohhhh but no, that doesn't count! It's not sincere! Oh...ok, then I dont' know what you want from me on that front. I'm moving on from that point.


Reread that part of the disclaimer you quote. Really try to be objective. Do you really think it makes the case you're trying to make? If so, I don't know if there is anything to discuss if you're going say red is black and black is red. I can't argue against not facing basic facts. Nobody forces you to believe anything, indeed. I can't force you to see anything either.

- written
URGENT AND WILL BE DELETED IN 24 HOURS

Jetmoo wrote:

I have requested a peaceful resolution. I dont have the cognitive ability right now to express properly. But i know you do not have the right to bully or harrass me. Or anyone else.

I am not a bully if a point out something someone is saying is untrue.

Please do not misunderstand me. This is not personal for me. I am not trying to make you feel bad. I just don't want misinformation to be spread.

Please do not call me a bully. That is not what this is about.

- written
Im done..

BA1 wrote:

Lano wrote:
His "beliefs" aren't being stated as a belief. They're being stated as a fact.

There are many who believe along the same lines and those beliefs are based on many qualifying facts.
You didn't even consider the disclaimer he presented, virtually at the top of his Post.

Okay, let's consider the disclaimer:

Gone wrote:

Only dare to read it if you are open to The Reality.

wow, can't believe I misunderstood that as him stating opinion as fact. Sheesh.

BA1 wrote:

So...your belief in the "facts" is what makes the facts factual? ๐Ÿ‘ˆ That's not a question.

No. I'm not sure what you're even talking about, but it occurs to me that you may not have the full context for what I'm referring to there. I'm referencing something that was mentioned in another thread that I gave evidence for being false, that the OP also participatin' in, and I assume saw, yet states in the original post above as fact. See this thread if you want to actually understand what I was referrring to:

https://help-qa.com/posts/1804-urgent-and-will-...

BA1 wrote:

Your apology is a tautology - so gratuitously shallow it bears absolutely no meaning. There was no "implication" involved - you called him a liar - you don't have enough finess to round that shoulder.
As for drawing himself into a corner - that's clearly a frame you quickly hammered up - intellectually, to you, but more panic driven from what I can tell.

My apology is not a tautology. I think you may not be understanding what that word means.

I really am sorry. The truth is sometimes painful. But I see the irony in you calling me a liar for apologizing for implying that someone else is a liar. Nice.

- written
- March 2012 - Putin wins the 2012 Russian presidential election (his third term)

I know at least some of this is true based on Mueller report findings, but you should list sources.

That Russia interfered in 2016 and are trying to interfere again is no secret, even Republicans have acknowledged that.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01...

- written
Im done..

NacthoMan wrote:
ok lano.. its not trump you hate.. its the dumbasses out there who support him lmao

Hate is a strong word. I know and associate with people who support Trump. A lot of them are good people.

I think we all have blind spots in our mentality and I think if these people were as dumb as they sound in the video in their day to day life, they wouldn't be able to function.

Not counting the ones who support Trump because they aren't willing to let a Democrat take office, the rest of them are just caught up in an emotional whirlwind that they can't see out of.

- written
Im done..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzDhm808oU4

- written
Im done..

aeolians.revenge wrote:
Ive written off lano a long time ago.
His seething hatred Toward trump and anyone who has a different opinion, other than his own.
Lano.. keeps blaming trump for everything including his own dirty laundry , which he will never take responsibilty for...............
....Maybe its time to get out of your parents basement.
Sigh.... or is that trumps fault?

lol, making this personal are we? Please, keep going, you're doing so well. Throw more things I've shared on this site that have nothing to do with this discussion back in my face. It's extremely classy.


I welcome different opinions. You aren't offering one in this comment. You're just trying to be insulting and failing miserably at it. I don't think it's suits you. I think you'll find kindness and rationality more fitting.


I only brought up Trump to point out the obvious contradiction in the fact that you seem to think he's doing a great job as president, but him and his government is doing everything in it's power to advance the things you are saying are being done for nefarious reasons. I'm guessing since you have no answer for it, and since there is not answer for it, that you can't resolve the contradiction. Or refuse to see it.

- written
Im done..

BA1 wrote:

I can be charitable too, Lano and assume that your narcisstic indulgence for self gratification isn't calling someone a liar, for simply stating their beliefs.
(Sigh).

His "beliefs" aren't being stated as a belief. They're being stated as a fact.

And a fact that I've shown to be untrue.

I'm sorry if the implication is that a lie is being said, but he drew himself into that corner.

As I said, maybe he didn't see it.

- written