1,951 replies, Replies 81 to 90

What about calling the site help me.com?

It's a good thought, Jetmoo.

- written
A great help..co.

https://help-qa.com/posts/135-mera

I remember, as many do.

- written
Im done..

My apology is not a tautology. I think you may not be understanding what that word means.

A clerical error on my part, a nasty reward from spell check when I blaze through too fast.

I'm sorry if the implication is that a lie is being said, but he drew himself into that corner.
------------------------
I really am sorry. The truth is sometimes painful. But I see the irony in you calling me a liar for apologizing for implying that someone else is a liar. Nice.

I called you a liar because you made NO "implication" of calling ROBBIE (not "someone" a quasi noun used to express a vague person) a liar - you called him a liar.

Your "sorrow" wasn't for having done this but instead has apologized to the world on his behalf? What, are you Jesus Christ now, suffering and apologizing to the world on behalf of those you call liars?

So...your belief in the "facts" is what makes the facts factual? ๐Ÿ‘ˆ That's not a question.

No. I'm not sure what you're even talking about, but it occurs to me that you may not have the full context for what I'm referring to there.

You're not sure? Can't understand even after I broke it down for you.
So, I'll say it again with more follow through;

Lano wrote His "beliefs" aren't being stated as a belief. They're being stated as a fact.
And a fact that I've shown to be untrue.

BA1 Replied His beliefs are based on many qualifying facts. Presenting a case that they are untrue is only a point of view -

- and apparently a point of view that means the most to you, yours.
So, stop stating what you believe as if they were fact. (Your rules, not mine).

Lano wrote:
Okay, let's consider the disclaimer:

Gone wrote: "Only dare to read it if you are open to The Reality."

wow, can't believe I misunderstood that as him stating opinion as fact. Sheesh.

You are what we, in the old school, call a "slippery *****bitch." You have no integrity and are deserving of every beat-down you get.
Is it defiance, Lano, or are you really that *******fucking dumb? Here's the disclaimer you knew I was talking about, but decided to be a ****shit-heel instead, and avoided (as usual) the meaning I intended it.
[‌quote]"Nobody forces you to believe this. Do your own research."[\quote]

- written
Im done..

Lano wrote:
His "beliefs" aren't being stated as a belief. They're being stated as a fact.

There are many who believe along the same lines and those beliefs are based on many qualifying facts.
You didn't even consider the disclaimer he presented, virtually at the top of his Post.

And a fact that I've shown to be untrue.

So...your belief in the "facts" is what makes the facts factual? ๐Ÿ‘ˆ That's not a question.

I'm sorry if the implication is that a lie is being said, but he drew himself into that corner.

Your apology is a tautology - so gratuitously shallow it bears absolutely no meaning. There was no "implication" involved - you called him a liar - you don't have enough finess to round that shoulder.
As for drawing himself into a corner - that's clearly a frame you quickly hammered up - intellectually, to you, but more panic driven from what I can tell.

As I said, maybe he didn't see it.

As you say....?

#0dd@mm, Lano do you go to bed whispering sweet nothings in your ear or what.

- written
Males perspective

Please bear in mind that I (or anyone here) can only reply based upon the information you present.

Anonymous Poster wrote:
Yeah I was a bit weary in the beginning because I felt he was using me financially before he expressed his interest towards me.

Had I known about this earlier, I would have considered it as a thought shaping circumstance.

- written
Im done..

Lano wrote:
I'm not sure if aeolian missed it when I did that or is just knowingly spreading lies. I'll be charitable and assume he just wasn't paying attention to that. Sigh.

I can be charitable too, Lano and assume that your narcisstic indulgence for self gratification isn't calling someone a liar, for simply stating their beliefs.
(Sigh).

- written
Im done..

@soco

BA1 wrote:
Does there need to be a source for common sense? If so, what then does that source have anything to do with your immortal soul?

https://youtu.be/4zvtFjJ-VOY

- written
Im done..

Yep. That sounds just about right. At least you can connect the dots, Robbie. There's already propaganda about it being "too early" to open the country and most people who believe that are living in a paid cellar they don't own.
You can't feed your kids a plate of love and nothing about the electric company is free. Nonetheless, Satan is on the move.
The words of scripture will come to pass.

- written
Males perspective

aeolians.revenge wrote:
Oh well. The censors are working great.

ALERT! ALERT! Thought criminal on the premises!๐Ÿ˜‹

- written
Males perspective

๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†
I somewhat agree with my brothers, above.

Females seldom understand the full brunt (a guy goes through) when they reject him.

First you told him you needed time to think (about it).

BUT that thought was based on a principal of age (and seemingly nothing of more considerable value)....
He's already older and he knows it. He has entered a period of his life where his chances of finding love become less and less.

EDIT wrote:
"I'll think about it."
The worse possible thing to say to anyone - here's why -
As children, we all grew up with parents who told us they would "think about it," when we asked certain things that would fuel our excitement.
In the end, "I'll think about," meant "NO." And after nursing on the tit of disappointment for so long, we tend to adopt the same strategy instead of making things bluntly clear.

So now, you've presented him with the ultimate no win situation. In order to say, "I'll think about it," he has to deal with the shameful situation of hearing a younger lady pull a parenting tactic when the irony is he's older than you....That's Part One.....

The final chapter comes in when, from that position of assumed authority, you measured the very issue of his age back to him.

"I'm willing to get to know you, but let me think about it because of our age difference."
๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†
That's what you might have said, but here's the subliminal undertone he's getting -
๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

"No. You're too old for love."

And telling him that you're "willing to get to know him," is (in one sense), like saying, "we can still be friends," which is a customary and classic kick in the nuts most every guy is familiar with regardless of age.

- written