16935743 1750032141977429 1455532587 o
Padre_J_Roulston
last online: <time class="timeago" datetime="1713403684" title="Apr 18, 2024 1:28">Apr 18, 2024 1:28</time>
Help-QA Volunteer Moderator
Verified User (6 years, 6 months)
Long Term User
Shoutout1

Another investment type question....

So, my company is looking at building a 91 home subdivision to the tune of $25 million dollars. Obviously we don't have that kind of money and are going to need to find investors. The goal is to have affordable housing rather than top end...

Based on the numbers that we are running we are going to get about a 5% return on the investment.

Now we are not likely to find a single investor for that amount of money. So it will likely be 10-20 investors putting in a million or two each.

So I guess my question is, do you think that 5% is a good enough return?

This open post was written |
Views: 57, Subscribers: 7 |
Leave a reply | Report Post

⇩ Zoom to bottom
Reciprocity (0)
Reciprocity
Since writing this post Padre_J_Roulston may have helped people, but has not within the last four (4) days.
Post Tags (5)
money, question, return, million, investors
Replies (19)
1581744157174 1581744149313 miss bot
last online: 03/19, 3:49
Verified User (6 years, 6 months)
Long Term User
Shoutout0
#
(39 minutes after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

5% when it is fully occupied? You should figure that it might take 3 years to get to that point. I would shoot for minimum 7.5% at 70% occupancy.

16935743 1750032141977429 1455532587 o
(42 minutes after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

soco wrote:
5% when it is fully occupied? You should figure that it might take 3 years to get to that point. I would shoot for minimum 7.5% at 70% occupancy.

That is the norm for the area, but they are all high end developments, where we want to do affordable housing. The costs to build the houses don't change much, but the cost to sell is significantly less. I think that is where the problem lies. No matter how I work the numbers, we don't get much more than 5%. :/

Roccoflip
(2 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

5% is considered quite low, especially for large investments.

However- if you marketed it properly, I think more people would be inclined to invest towards a "helping the needy" goal.

Yorick
(7 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

hmm .. i like rockster's perspective on that.

only thing is .. what if all these robber (baby) boomers or high income families buy out all these affordable homes and screw over the needy once more.

16935743 1750032141977429 1455532587 o
(11 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

NaCtHoMaN wrote:
hmm .. i like rockster's perspective on that.

only thing is .. what if all these robber (baby) boomers or high income families buy out all these affordable homes and screw over the needy once more.

Well In theory we will be able to choose who we sell to... But ultimately nothing...

This reply has been removed.
Roccoflip
(13 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Not sure how it works over there- but here we have communities of “low-income housing” where people have to apply and submit their proof of income before being approved.

However, it’s usually for apartments or similar.
You could potentially set up an HOA where one of the requirements is that you can’t rent the properties, and/or have to be within a certain income bracket.

There are ALWAYS ways to game the system. Every system. What it comes down to is a balance of work you put into “security” vs how much work it takes for a malicious person to crack vs how much more difficult it makes for an innocent participant to be approved. 🤷‍♂️

Yorick
(2 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

again.. i think rocksters really on point here.

05ad6afe 1f85 4c4a 8680 4f73a3c1f45c
last online: <time class="timeago" datetime="1713410299" title="Apr 18, 2024 3:18">Apr 18, 2024 3:18</time>
Verified User (6 years, 1 month)
Long Term User
Shoutout0
#
(2 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

It's a good investment if you have only a few investors. Obviously if i put 500 bucks into an investment, I expect more than 5 dollars back. But putting a million and getting 50 grand back isn't that bad, if it's a low risk and relatively short term deal.

Yorick
(2 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

if fairness is in play .. should be in 15% range, not too greedy and decent returns.. 5 percent is .. quite fairly low to get people interested. think of it 5 bucks gain for every 100 dollars pushed. .. gets all the " why bother " vibes goin there.

Sherlock by olga tereshenko d9qdidc
(2 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Be prepared for a lot of people to default on the rent.

Yorick
(2 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Sherlock wrote:
Be prepared for a lot of people to default on the rent.

shouldn't be a problem if they're qualified to afford it. maybe the "rent to own" measure would safeguard the commitment?

Dr. ralph club zps9ornptsl
(1 week after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

People still default and the laws protect them. Being a landlord is hell, my dad owned rental property and it was insane what people could get away with. Move in, never pay rent, trash your property and stay 90 days. If they're pregnant it's about impossible to evict them. I guess it depends on the economic health in your area.

Sherlock by olga tereshenko d9qdidc
(1 week after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

I'm dealing with such a problem right now. People think that paying rent is optional if they have a good enough "hard luck" story--and believe me, they are never without a "hard luck" story.

Sherlock by olga tereshenko d9qdidc
(1 week after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

As for the investment, I wouldn't do it. Ninety-one units. Ninety-one renters--about 25% at any one time won't be paying the rent. Imagine dealing with that week in, week out, month in, month out. They'll have the money for the rent--but will spend it on weed or booze.

You have no idea, Padre, just how irresponsible people can be until you are a landlord!!!

Sherlock by olga tereshenko d9qdidc
(1 week after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

And it doesn't take many bad renters to destroy your investment. I just had one turkey do $9,000 worth of damage because the idiot's girlfriend stopped up the commode with tampons, and just kept flushing, flushing, flushing the toilet until it flooded all of the downstairs. You will realize, after you've rented out a house, that there is no limit to some people's stupidity.

16935743 1750032141977429 1455532587 o
(1 week after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

These aren't going to be rental properties... they are going to be for resale. 🙂

Sherlock by olga tereshenko d9qdidc
(1 week after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

No problem then--someone else's headaches!

Yorick
(2 months after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

no no no.. dont stop .. that loving feeling...

A
⇧ Zoom to top

Help-QA supports basic Markdown, emoji 😁, and tagging friends with @username!