907 replies, Replies 201 to 210

I think a good healthy thing to do is

My earliest posts on this site are from 2 years ago.

I dont see much of a difference from what i saw.


Did make me feel a little sad cus more variety of people commented on my stuff.

- written
I think a good healthy thing to do is

Anonymous wrote:
I thought it was gonna be drink bleach but looking back at your old posts is certainly much more healthy you're right.

No, you gotta inject the bleach amd sunlight INTO the body, if they can find some way to do that i think it'd be terrific

- written
Of course!

Yes.

Eventually.

In the meantime take comfort in the fact that your request has been submitted to the (probably) correct channels and will go through a complicated bureaucratic process that will ensure the correctness of your form and that you will get a...comparatively prompt response within a definitely finite amount of time.

- written
looking around

Depends what you're looking for. But also yes.

- written
Life a game of F**K

Anonymous wrote:
I wanna get off

That's inappropriate.

- written
Do you think being in love in a relationship is important?

Well, kids in the picture is different. It complicates things.

The perspective I would offer as one who was once a kid is that I tend to agree about kids wanting to see their parents happy.

My parents never liked eachother, and I don't think living with them gave us a good example on meaningful and effective conflict resolution, since they were bad at it.

The thought of my parents divorcing was an interesting, if not completely welcome prospect to me, and at points in my childhood I thought it would be inevitable.

It's still somewhat mysterious to me that my parents ever got married in the first place. They're still together and I at this point I'd rather they be together because they're so old I think it would be hard for both of them to be alone. I mean, they're not that old, late sixties and seventy, but still.

- written
Do you think being in love in a relationship is important?

Okay then, here's the long answer

lirou wrote:
Thanks for replying :)
I actually didn't intend for the post to be anonymous but I guess it doesn't matter.

I know its important to many people but I was wondering how often people are actually "in love" in their relationships or if they're mostly in it for other reasons like kids, money, loneliness, etc. Being in love is ideal of course. I just don't know how realistic it is for the average person, especially once there are kids and work and real, everyday life becomes the priority. It's interesting you point out that being in love usually comes from being in a relationship long enough. My experience has been the opposite of that most times, like the longer I know the person, the less "in love" I feel, but I guess that's not really being in love then is it?

I don't have a diverse experience with relationships. I've only dated two women, both long term relationships, one of whom I am still dating. So in that sense I do not think my experience is ideal for answering certain questions about love. Take that as a disclaimer.

I do not think I was in love in the first relationship, and I don't think we ever said "I love you." I liked her but I don't think the feelings were symmetrical if that makes sense. We dated for about nine months or so. It wasn't a bad relationship but I think we both felt at a certain point that it "wasn't going anywhere" which what the heck does that mean anyway, I don't think anyone knows, but it seemed to be our consensus.

It was for the best, because I don't think spending more time in the relationship would have made the in love feeling happen.

With my current gf we've been dating for like three years now and I do not feel like the "in loveness" once I realized it happened, has really altered in terms of magnitude in anyway. Sometimes she does stuff that bugs me which makes the "in loveness" feeling recede into the background because I'm annoyed at her or something but after I'm over it it comes back.

There is a type of insecurity for me, which I have experienced in both my relationships, of "Do they really like/love me or are they just really dry for a relationship and I was the best option that came along?" Which is a terrible thing to think but like I said, I'm insecure about things sometimes. My point is, clearly whether or not I am not only in love, but also that the other person feels the same way, is VERY important to me.

Why? I'm not sure. People aren't robots, we're not completely logical. I could wax philosophical on that but I'll end my reply here.

- written
Purely sociological, honest question:

verge wrote:
There's just more to it than looks for me and most people I think. People look attractive to me if they are intelligent and kind. I'd love my husband no matter what he looked like because of who he is.

What if he looked like Billy Joel?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn77MaYi-cY

- written
Purely sociological, honest question:

Anonymous wrote:

A famous example would be maybe, Nathan Fillion. I thought he was cute since I first 'met' him in Firefly. He's a bit thicker today than when he was in Firefly and still looks attractive.

Not sure I'd call Nathon Fillion old...I mean, he's not even fifty.

Now if you said Eric Idle, my eyebrows would perk up.

- written
Purely sociological, honest question:

BananaLlama wrote:

I think there is a unconscious attraction to women with wide hips for that reason.

On a similar note I fear that with all the c sections, women with wide hips will become less and less.

Well, perhaps wide hippers won't be less, just narrow hippers will be more. I would think that the elimination of a need for a certain characteristic won't make that characteristic disappear, it will just make the absence of that characteristic more prevalent since nothing is stopping it from being eliminated.

- written