HelpQA Tags Search FAQ
Start a New Post Chat Login & Registration

909 replies, Replies 161 to 170

Anyone here smoke cigars?

DocteurRalph wrote:
I've tried smoking cigars but I think they're pretty gross too, which is weird since I smoke about everything in the world except cigars. I even smoked some kratom just to see if anything would happen a couple of weeks ago and even it wasn't as gross as a nasty cigar, ha.

I even have two real live Cuban cigars a cigar aficionado gave me too, sitting in a ziplock bag with some humidity control pack the guy threw in there. He also gave me two Cuban seed cigars that he said I should compare them with just so I would see how much better a real Cuban cigar was. I took a couple of puffs of each and turned green, I just don't get it.

Well you may be talking about two different things at once. First, there is taste, and admittedly, not all cigars taste good. Taste is subjective anyway, but even so, some cigars just taste like ash or acid, though it seems cigar smokers would say if that is the case, then you are not smoking a "good cigar."

As far as "good cigars" go, I feel like if you're the type of person who drinks bourbon because they like the taste, then you may enjoy cigar flavors....there ought to be a woody, smokey taste to the cigar, and I have heard people claim that they get pepper notes as well, depending on the cigar.

However, still on taste: Apparently, cigars are rather fickle and delicate. Lighting it incorrectly can negatively effect the flavor, as well as flicking it too hard when you are trying to tap off excess ash.

I admit that half the time in my experience smoking, I have not really enjoyed the flavor. Some are bad from the beginning, and some start good and go bad, or start bad and turn good.

Though I have only learned how to light them correctly over the past few weeks, and I am still a novice in these things.

On turning green, it may be that you are smoking it too fast. You should try to limit yourself to about one or two drags per minute. Literally, per minute. Think slow, gentle inhales.

There is a rhythm to smoking a cigar, and if you smoke too fast, you'll get hit really hard with the nicotine rush and also overload your mouth with the smoke flavors. If you smoke too slow, it will go out, and then you'll have to relight which also negatively effects the flavor because you are applying fire to the stick again.

- written
Anyone here smoke cigars?

NacthoMan wrote:
not regularly, i once had a real Cuban cigar long ago.. such a smooth sweet flavor.. havent been able to get my hands on some for quite some time.

Never smoked a cuban and i imagine i never will unless politics change.

There are a lot of smoke shops by me. Been stressed lately and just find it really satisfying to go for a walk smoke one. I don't do it often, i smoked 2 this week which is way more than i usually do (usually i'll smoke one and then not for a couple months.)

A brand i have come to like is David Ehrlich.

- written
Anyone here smoke cigars?

verge wrote:
I too think you should quit. Super gross.

Thanks for the input.

- written
Anyone here smoke cigars?

soco wrote:
I turn 96 next year. Still, I hope I receive an invite to your funeral.

I'll arrange for my family to give out free cigars to everyone at the event.

- written
There should be a law that if you are a politician, you're just not allowed to have any investments in anything.

i only know lamar from the impeachment when he basically said "yes trump did what the democrats said he did but he appoints conservative judges and the stock market is up so im still going to vote and campaign for him"

- written
There should be a law that if you are a politician, you're just not allowed to have any investments in anything.

I wonder how many politicians would just not bother running if the rules changed tomorrow.

- written
There should be a law that if you are a politician, you're just not allowed to have any investments in anything.

Padre_J_Roulston wrote:
There was a book I read once (a fantasy novel) where the one country all of the people in government had to sell ALL their property, stocks, etc. and the money was put into the treasury. They were given comfortable if bland government housing, clothing, etc.

When their term was completed they were given back their money adjusted based on how well the country did economically. If the country made a profit, they got a little extra, if they were at a loss, they got less. And they couldn't make a profit by raising taxes.

One could not refuse a nomination, or choose not to do the job. If they did, then their property was sold anyway and added to the treasury, and they were imprisoned/executed.

I think we need a less extreme form of that.

The idea of registering for public service draft is interesting to me.

Serving your time essentially. That's cool.

- written
Have you ever cut off a family member.

Not for me. I know that happened to a boy on our block when he came out. Also my dad sort of shunned a couple of his cousins for a few years but he got over it eventually and i think they're mostly good now.

- written
List of "HOW DARE YOU" LIES I was once made to believe:

Anonymous wrote:

Respectful disagreements in the same order you went:

God

No. No they should not be allowed to have their god. But if it is insisted, at least let them have a personal journey with god on their own. No organized religion/indoctrination. It's been pushed in the faces of those who can see the similarities between god and santa are just to damn close to be ignored for far too long. And herd mentality really has no place in politics or anywhere else where critical thinking is vital. At this point in my view it would be inviting mental illness to affect some of our most important choices of our lives.

If ANYONE - ANY DAMN ONE - can show me enough evidence that there's reason we should believe in god any more than santa clause I'll totally let you have it though. I promise. But Bible alone is not enough not even close.

Well, the conversation is hypothetical, but let's say we could, by banging a gavel, force people to stop practicing religion.

I think that, to say "you're not allowed to teach your children about your fake religion that I know is fake because no one has proven it right yet" is wrong for the same reasons that it is wrong to indoctrinate anyone into anything.

Santa is bad because your parents KNOW that Santa isn't real. If your parents "know" that Odin is real and believe that teaching you about Odin is the best way to put you on the path to the most fulfilling life possible, it's their right to teach you about it and to gather with others and celebrate Odin with each other.

Give children the critical thinking skills. They will leave religion on their own, or if they don't, at least approach it with a more critical eye.

Anonymous wrote:

Law

Law is supposed to be just. Being just suggests fairness and equality under the law. Actually "just" is defined in the dictionary as: "based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair." Don't defend such an obvious crock of ****shit dude. Of course it's not fair but how many people know it's supposed to be? I'm a law idiot and I just ran a Google search here's intro to law and ethics 101: "Based on societyโ€™s ethics, laws are created and enforced by governments to mediate our relationships with each other, and to protect its citizens. While laws carry with them a punishment for violations, ethics do not. Essentially, laws enforce the behaviors we are expected to follow, while ethics suggest what we ought to follow, and help us explore options to improve our decision-making."

Law and personal ethics do not mix(unless they're shady c**** and do it anyway). There are professional and national ethics that are absolutely in play though when concerning rule of law.
(in which btw decisions aren't made because anyone thinks god wants it that way, we make those decisions based on the supposed just laws that the people we elected made up so that we may be governed. Including god would be a personal ethic not a national one. America is not a Christian nation. Or any other religion.)

Law clearly deals in some kind of ethics though.

You're right in the sense that we do have rules and expectations in place to try and insure that, in applying the law, people in the legal profession are as fair as possible.

The law itself though, meaning the actual laws, are not fair, and are in certain contexts very unfair (and where despite their obvious unfairness, you are still expected to pay a penalty for breaking them).

Is it fair that "ignorance of the law is no excuse" so that, if I don't know the speed limit I still have to pay the fine even though I didn't see any posted speed limit signs? No.

Is it unethical to steal bread that I will die without from a wealthy baker? No.

That's what I mean when I say "law is not the same as ethics" which is what I remember my business law teacher said back in junior high. She was cute so I payed attention.

- written
List of "HOW DARE YOU" LIES I was once made to believe:

On the list though:

the Tooth Fairy
the Easter Bunny
Santa Claus

Agreed, no need for these fictions, they don't do anything positive for your kid and can only hurt.

God

In my opinion, the correct position on God is agnosticism, and I tend to give people who feel that have real spiritual experiences with the divine the benefit of the doubt, even if I can doubt whether or not they have really experienced it...let people have god if they want.

law is fair

Clearly it isn't but it's also not supposed to be, from what little I've studied of it. the law is just the law, some laws are fair, others aren't. It depends on the context. And law and ethics are not the same thing either.

America is the greatest/freest country in the world

It is among the freest and greatest, along with countries in the EU and Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan. But that's only virtue of so many other nations being so terrible.

Work hard and be rewarded

Well...again, depends on the context, but yes, lots of people work very hard and do not get a proportionate reward for it.

Circumcision without consent at birth is good(more a theft AND a lie)

Agree with this so hard

"You're special"

You are!

- written

To use this site you must be 13 years or older and occasionally submit your email address. Your email address is only shared with your explicit permission.

Home Page - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Feedback